Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Language Blog

Language Blog
Spending at least 15 minutes taking part in a conversation where you are not permitted to speak was very frustrating for my partner and I. Trying to communicate and convey a message to one another was difficult and time consuming. Where a simple question like how was your day took normally about 4 seconds to ask it took about the whole 15 minutes to process and convey that message to each other. My partner did alter the way they communicated because they had no choice. When someone can’t speak to one another the way they receive and process each message can be a little challenging. My partner had to take it very slowly with each sound.
I tried to ask my partner how was your day, but there was no change in topics since we ran out of time trying to communicate. If the balance of power were between two individuals the person starting the conversation would have the power. I feel that the person leading the conversation holds the power because they hold the key in portraying or conveying a message.
If the conversation represented two different cultures, one that uses spoken language and one that did not, the culture that did not speak would have the advantage.  I feel that the culture that already had established a language would be lost trying to figure out what the other culture is trying to convey and would treat them like if they were ignorant. People today are very judgmental towards other cultures. Trying to understand each other’s native language is hard but a culture that does not use symbolic language is even harder.
Communicating for 15 minutes without any physical embellishments was not very difficult. We were able to say what we wanted to communicate but without being able to express feelings through our movements in our hands and face gestures. We would constantly forget that we were not able to communicate without using physical embellishments. It was not difficult to understand but it was a very limited conversation without being able to portray feelings. It was very dry. I feel that this experiment says that the gestures and face expression are a very important part of communicating effectively. The humans portray when someone is sad, angry, passionate, energetic and so many other emotions though a person’s body language tying everything up with the spoken language making the whole conversation more effective.  The benefit to possessing the ability to read body language is that you are able to recognize how someone feels. For example when a person is in love and wants a relationship they are able to express their emotions through body language and that’s how a person finds their mate.

Are there people who have difficulty reading body language and can you identify them? Can you describe a situation where there might be a benefit to not reading someone’s body language, i.e., a situation where perhaps body language does not give you reliable information? There is people that have a difficult time reading body language and usually they are not very effective communicators. They miss a lot of the messages that come from body language. One benefit that body language brings is that you can sense weather or not someone likes you or dislikes you. A disadvantage is that many people misread body language and portrays message completely different from the actual message.

2 comments:

  1. I believe you may have misunderstood the instructions, which will skew your conclusions. Only you were to have limitations applied to your communication. Your partner should have been talking normally for both experiments.

    In the section on power and control, I'm not surprised you concluded that you had more control given how you conducted the experiment, but can you speculate as to how this conclusion would have changed if your partner has been speaking normally?

    For the third section, remember that the question specifically asked which culture would be better communicating complex ideas? Could you explain natural selection or Einstein's theory of relativity without symbolic language? Could we even do science with out symbolic language?

    I'm very curious as to your conclusions regarding the attitudes between cultures. It might have helped if you answered the last part of this section first: Can you think of a real-life situation that mirrors the conditions of this experiment, understanding that this means one person speaking normally and the other not speaking and just using body language? We see that in the interaction between English speakers and non-English speaking immigrant populations. Think about how non-English speaking immigrants are treated in Southern California? Are they treated as equals? Who is at a disadvantage there the speaking culture or the non-speaking culture? Is the non-speaking culture superior to the speaking or the other way around? Does this make you reconsider your conclusions regarding attitudes between the two groups?

    With regard to the second experiment, again your partner should have been speaking with full use of body language.

    While I don't disagree with your conclusions as far as the information gained from body language, you are only considering the situation where body language matches and supports the information you receive from spoken language. What does it tell you when the body language doesn't match the spoken language? Humans tend to use body language as a type of lie detector. If spoken words don't match with the body language, we are more inclined to believe the body language and doubt the words. Think about how being able to detect liars might help an individual's ability to survive and reproduce (which applies to the next section).

    Can you identify specific groups who have difficulty reading body language due to physical or mental disabilities?

    The last question asks you to figure out a situation where body language may mislead you and therefore it might be best to ignore it. Do all cultures use the same system of body language? If you travel to another country, can you trust the information you get from their body language?

    If you aren't sure about guidelines, or something doesn't make sense to you, make sure you email me to confirm or clarify.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh man, I could not imagine how difficult it would have been for both partners to not be able to communicate without language! I guess this goes back to our ancestors developing language. Imagine having to communicate that way every day for the rest of your life? Completing tasks as a group would take an eternity. Honestly, I think I would end up working by myself because it would be so frustrating not being able to communicate exactly what I wanted. This would cause a species to disband and be isolationists. This in turn would reduce the reproduction rate and possibly cause extinction.

    ReplyDelete